I'd spent parts of the last year or so upgrading my computer from just powerful, to also wanting to be powerful and beautiful to look at. In that regard I'd been a fan of the looks of Gigabyte's Vision line for a while. I'm definitely more of a gamer than a creative (though I do dabble there) but generally a mobo doesn't factor into that as much, beyond ports. So when upgrading to an i9-10850k due to good sales, I pulled the trigger on this Vision G board as it was gorgeous and seemed full featured for the price. And now I'm exchanging it.The main issues here, which aren't mentioned anywhere on Amazon, and I found hard to find even on Gigabyte's page is that the m.2 slots are restrictive to performance. One thing that I found to be a big seller on this board was its four(4) M.2 slots. I don't have 4 m.2 drives yet, but I have 2 and like expandability, so for $280 it seemed like a steal. But when you get your board, if you have a 10th Gen CPU like me, you'll find the top m.2 slot doesn't work. It is "reserved for 11th Gen" to take advantage of the more PCIe lanes and PCIe 4.0.That sucks, and drove me nuts when trying to launch my PC the first time after the build. But I discount that slightly as this seems to be a common thing with z590 boards. Its not just this board/Gigabyte, and I have 3 other ports, so it should be fine right? Well, wrong. Purely by design decisions from Gigabyte if either of the middle two(2) m.2 slots are in use then your x16 PCIe slot is cut in half to x8. For some reason they decided to put them on a switch with the first PCIe slot for direct to CPU performance. I understand m.2 nvme can/does operate off PCIe, and it is a bigger feature to have them direct to CPU in PCIe 4.0, but generally that isn't at the detriment of your GPU. Just for the most technically minded: this is both for if you have a 10th Gen or an 11th Gen CPU, it doesn't matter that 11th Gen has the more PCIe lanes to possibly handle this your PCIe lane is locked at x8. This doesn't even get excused as "Its a creator board" because even creators need their graphics card, many video edit and stream like I do on occasion, even if they don't game, so this is absurd.So that seems/is a lot of negative for you right at the top, and is why I'm exchanging it. So why still 3 Stars?Well, to start off its because that information is on the Gigabyte website if you look at the specs or the manual. Takes a bit more research than I did, and more than many might do. But I like to pride myself in usually doing that due diligence so I can't fault them fully for that. Another more technical factor is that, at least in theory, x8 shouldn't actually hinder anything. I have an Asus ROG Strix 2080 Super in my computer, and by all accounts I can find, even overclocked to its maximum this thing shouldn't be able to to ever even hit the bandwidth cap for PCIe 3.0 at x8. None of the Nvidia 20 Series should, and possibly the 30 Series shouldn't either. So at least in concept you shouldn't notice a performance dip. This is especially gonna be true if you buy this mobo for an 11th Gen CPU because that unlocks PCIe 4.0 which has double the bandwidth limits. I wasn't ready to spend nearly $300 on a mobo and possibly leave performance on the table in the future, as future GPUs or PCIe cards I need might hit that bandwidth cap, and there are other boards that don't do this.The other good to bring up is just outright good. First up are the looks. Its just absolutely beautiful. I still love everything about the looks of the Vision line. Clean and white/silver that matches my case and build to a tee, and clean lines that just look beautiful. The LEDs are sparse, and clean. I'd maybe have liked more features to control them from Gigabyte's app, but honestly even though I would like that, they are generally just bars of light so its fine. The other thing is that while I didn't like the m.2 performance on the board, the amount of slots and their ease of use really is worth noting. I had no issues accessing or seating a drive in any m.2 slot. I also like the I/O on this board. All slots on the board itself were easy to access, and the 5 USB-A 3.2 and 2 USB-C 3.2 ports along with a BIOS Flashback port and 2.G Ethernet is well featured for any creative or gamer. The board, and Gigabyte's BIOS also was good for my CPU's performance. The 10850k's base clock is 3.6Ghz with an overclock boost limit reported at 5.2Ghz (and that's confirmed to be highest stable I've found). This mobo was giving me 4.8Ghz on all 10 cores without applying any tuning or boost settings. That is a really good default optimization.Overall, its a fine board, but for Z grade and $279 you can do better. I'm not replacing it for Gigabyte's Vision D because while it doesn't have the same m.2 issues for the PCIe lane, but it is also over $100 more which isn't worth it when Gigabyte burned me on this one. I considered the Asus ROG Strix Z590-A to replace it, though the harsher gaming looks weren't my favorite, but it was a greatly featured board for $329, but I didn't need the wifi or want to pay more. So I settled on the Asus Prime Z590-A which has some softer looks than the ROG and still almost all the same features for the same $280 as the Vision G. Unless you need a BIOS Flashback port, I recommend this board.