I participated in the survey and received Dr. Breus' feedback and suggestions as a part of a consultation to a corporate client. I reviewed his book in relation to that feedback. The criticism I offer is largely based on the limitations of the survey and the tightly defined criteria in the categories--dolphin, lion, wolf, bear. Like another reviewer, the issue arises when you are not squarely within one of his categories and a hybrid of two or more. As a psychologist I'd expect Dr. Breus would at least qualify that these categories are handy, but not definitive, and that respondents will likely fall along a continuum that may straddle categories or include traits from multiple categories. In my case, I found Dr. Breus' summary of my category based on the survey result was substantially incorrect (at least half of the characteristics he attributed were not accurate), and objectively contrary to the answers actually given in the survey. In reading the summary description of categories in the book, it is clearly not close. This problem arises, aside from failure to address the categories in terms of a continuum and instead shoehorn participants into one discreet classification, from what I think are two problems with the survey itself. First, it presents a number of questions as binary "this or that" without clarifying what constitutes a "best response". As an example, there is a question about whether, when you have an appointment or event scheduled for the morning, you set your alarm, set multiple alarms, or naturally awaken at the appropriate time. I in fact naturally awaken at the appropriate time--I'm one of those people for whom the ability to do so is "uncanny". However, as a responsible person I also set my alarm as a failsafe. I'm not saying the question or methodology is necessarily flawed, because we're not sure what he's really attempting to get at since his approach goes beyond sleep habits and extends into the realm of personality traits and behavior. The question, however, leaves the door open to ambiguous response which is the thrust of my criticism. There are numbers of questions like this one. Second, if you've already done research, educated yourself and/or consulted with a professional or trainer about sleep, rest and recovery, you probably won't be looking at this book (and I wouldn't either, if not conscripted to respond as a part of the corporate consultancy). That said, for those who have already modified sleep habits, sleep environment, and other behavior related to sleep and rest, the survey does not clearly instruct respondents to account for that versus our natural tendencies before modification. As an example, my natural disposition is to stay up late, typically midnight to 1 a.m. or even later, and to awake at 7 a.m. I typically operate on 5-6 hours sleep, may feel times of fatigue which I power through, and catch up with an extra hour of sleep when able. However, after resuming intensive strength and cardio training and athletic competition, I got "religion" about rest and recovery and modified sleep habits, environment and timing to optimize recovery. That matters, because I responded to the survey based on my modifications, not my natural predisposition. I assume Breaus is interested in the natural predisposed habits and behaviors, for purposes of his chronotyping. That may explain, as well, why his attempts to characterize personality and behavior traits based on his rigid chronotype categories is so wildly off-base in my case--I intentionally adopted the sleep habits of another category in part, but in fact am a much closer fit on a continuum along two others. Be aware of these points when you take his survey and when reading back the results. I endorse the other reviewer's suggestion to take his survey online and then assess whether you think the initial readout you get is a fit--if so, you may benefit and if not don't waste your time. I give the book two stars for the above reasons, the limited utility of Dr. Breus' approach here, and because, while the book indeed contains good information that is going to be useful to the reader, none of it is unique to this book and is readily available in materials that stick closer to the peer reviewed research in the field and steer away from the gimmicky and I think flawed attempt at rigid typology that might confuse and mislead readers unnecessarily. Honestly, there seems little doubt about the validity of Breus' credentials, but he's not the only bona fide specialist who seems more fixated on marketing his branded products than good research and its proper application to individuated cases. That said, if you take the online survey and it clicks for you, Breus certainly includes a range of research and data-based ideas and recommendations you may find helpful if you haven't already looked at the generally available guidance on age-based sleep requirements, quality of sleep relative to rest and recovery values, diet and nutrition related to sleep, pre-sleep habits like avoiding certain meals and substances, avoiding blue screen viewing (video or e-readers or poring over your iPhone texts and emails) just before bed, and keeping the room quiet, dark, cool (65-68 degrees), as well as free of video monitors and electronic devices while sleeping. There's good information about bedding, and bed clothes (or lack thereof). There's good information about rhythms, jet lag, alert and aroused states, and optimal times to perform certain activities in light of that information. A lot of it is provided in this book, and all of it is available elsewhere. Other reviewers have already addressed the fact that the book also fails to adequately address those who do shift work or are otherwise required by the mandates of operations and work schedules, to be awake and functional outside the lines of their optimal waking period and can't sleep in accordance with their optimal sleep guidelines.